What happens when smart meters make the world's doctors so sick they are no longer able to work? The lives they would have saved and helped are also harmed, not to mention their families' suffering.
Worldwide, SMART METERS ARE RUINING PEOPLE's LIVES. The insane denial will eventually be drowned out. How many will ruined lives will it take?
Saturday, March 31, 2012
Thursday, March 29, 2012
Will 300 million smart meters "break China?"
The State Grid Corporation of China is going to stomp on the throat of its own nation's vigor, installing 300 million dangerous, microwave-spewing smart meters by the end of 2015. Well, at least Americans won't be the only lab rats for non-thermal effects. It will give scientists worldwide a much large population to study to death before finally admitting the full impact of the great experiment.
Wednesday, March 7, 2012
Sunday, March 4, 2012
Studies showing no radiofrequency radiation effects on rats missing important factors
I have been reading some of the studies at PubMed, such as this one, which find no effect of radiofrequency exposure on lab animals, including memory function or sleep patterns, etc.
However, none of the animals in these studies were made to have higher levels of heavy metals/mercury, metallic implants, diabetes or other factors that could interact with rf to cause or amplify effects.
Overall health status, genetics and age (very young/very old) are all factors not accounted for. And the length and cumulative doses of exposure would not necessarily mirror the chonic dosing people are getting today. Therefore, to say studies of healthy rats prove rf radiation is harmless to humans as they are exposed today is illogical (and irresponsible).
However, none of the animals in these studies were made to have higher levels of heavy metals/mercury, metallic implants, diabetes or other factors that could interact with rf to cause or amplify effects.
Overall health status, genetics and age (very young/very old) are all factors not accounted for. And the length and cumulative doses of exposure would not necessarily mirror the chonic dosing people are getting today. Therefore, to say studies of healthy rats prove rf radiation is harmless to humans as they are exposed today is illogical (and irresponsible).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Saturday, March 31, 2012
AU Doctor reports smart meters ruining her life, ignored by Premier
What happens when smart meters make the world's doctors so sick they are no longer able to work? The lives they would have saved and helped are also harmed, not to mention their families' suffering.
Worldwide, SMART METERS ARE RUINING PEOPLE's LIVES. The insane denial will eventually be drowned out. How many will ruined lives will it take?
Worldwide, SMART METERS ARE RUINING PEOPLE's LIVES. The insane denial will eventually be drowned out. How many will ruined lives will it take?
Thursday, March 29, 2012
Will 300 million smart meters "break China?"
The State Grid Corporation of China is going to stomp on the throat of its own nation's vigor, installing 300 million dangerous, microwave-spewing smart meters by the end of 2015. Well, at least Americans won't be the only lab rats for non-thermal effects. It will give scientists worldwide a much large population to study to death before finally admitting the full impact of the great experiment.
Wednesday, March 7, 2012
Sunday, March 4, 2012
Studies showing no radiofrequency radiation effects on rats missing important factors
I have been reading some of the studies at PubMed, such as this one, which find no effect of radiofrequency exposure on lab animals, including memory function or sleep patterns, etc.
However, none of the animals in these studies were made to have higher levels of heavy metals/mercury, metallic implants, diabetes or other factors that could interact with rf to cause or amplify effects.
Overall health status, genetics and age (very young/very old) are all factors not accounted for. And the length and cumulative doses of exposure would not necessarily mirror the chonic dosing people are getting today. Therefore, to say studies of healthy rats prove rf radiation is harmless to humans as they are exposed today is illogical (and irresponsible).
However, none of the animals in these studies were made to have higher levels of heavy metals/mercury, metallic implants, diabetes or other factors that could interact with rf to cause or amplify effects.
Overall health status, genetics and age (very young/very old) are all factors not accounted for. And the length and cumulative doses of exposure would not necessarily mirror the chonic dosing people are getting today. Therefore, to say studies of healthy rats prove rf radiation is harmless to humans as they are exposed today is illogical (and irresponsible).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)