The age-old adage First Do No Harm should be the tempering goal of not only medicine, but government and industry, especially when they team up to deploy new technologies, set policies and serve the people.

This blog exists to reveal and analyze areas in which these powerful groups are failing to "first do no harm."

Sunday, September 25, 2011

Anthony Swerdlow telecom investor's study says cell phones safe


Evidence "increasingly against" phone cancer risk


URL of this page: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/news/fullstory_113933.html (*this news item will not be available after 10/02/2011)

Monday, July 4, 2011

The Reuters article by Ben Hirschler touted a new study that found no link with brain cancer and cell phone use, despite the World Health Organization's new classification of cell phone use and other wireless radiofrequency sources of radiation as potential cancer agents.

Turns out the guy who led the study and his wife own shares in telecom companies world wide, creating a blatant conflict of interest. Anthony Swerdlow of Britain's Institute of Cancer Research, IARC, "said it should become much clearer over the next few years whether or not there was any plausible link," since his study did not back up the WHO's call for caution.

In plain words, the industry stockholder conducted a study and said he found no link of health harm from the devices he was invested in. So, let the great experiment on the people continue until all studies show harm, even those conducted by industry shills like him. Amazing.


No comments:

Post a Comment

Sunday, September 25, 2011

Anthony Swerdlow telecom investor's study says cell phones safe


Evidence "increasingly against" phone cancer risk


URL of this page: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/news/fullstory_113933.html (*this news item will not be available after 10/02/2011)

Monday, July 4, 2011

The Reuters article by Ben Hirschler touted a new study that found no link with brain cancer and cell phone use, despite the World Health Organization's new classification of cell phone use and other wireless radiofrequency sources of radiation as potential cancer agents.

Turns out the guy who led the study and his wife own shares in telecom companies world wide, creating a blatant conflict of interest. Anthony Swerdlow of Britain's Institute of Cancer Research, IARC, "said it should become much clearer over the next few years whether or not there was any plausible link," since his study did not back up the WHO's call for caution.

In plain words, the industry stockholder conducted a study and said he found no link of health harm from the devices he was invested in. So, let the great experiment on the people continue until all studies show harm, even those conducted by industry shills like him. Amazing.


No comments:

Post a Comment