SCIENCE SAYS: Man-made EMR dangerous, unlike Natural EMR

MAN-MADE MICROWAVES have grown to levels up to  10¹⁸ power higher than natural levels from the beginning of life on Earth, according to Dr. Leif Salford, neurosurgeon and researcher, who has studied the biological impacts of this radiation on our brains.

Furthermore, we can no longer say man-made wireless/EMR is harmless because we believe it is no different than Natural EMR. SCIENCE says this is simply not true. Therefore, those stating this untruth are not referring to science, but their own wishful thinking. 

Polarization: A Key Difference between Man-made and Natural Electromagnetic Fields, in regard to Biological Activity.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26456585

Sci Rep. 2015 Oct 12;5:14914. doi: 10.1038/srep14914.
Polarization: A Key Difference between Man-made and Natural Electromagnetic Fields, in regard to Biological Activity.   Panagopoulos DJ1,2,3, Johansson O4, Carlo GL5.

Author information  1National Center for Scientific Research "Demokritos", Athens, Greece.
2Department of Biology, University of Athens, Greece.
3Radiation and Environmental Biophysics Research Centre, Greece.
4Experimental Dermatology Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
5The Science and Public Policy Institute, Institute for Healthful Adaptation, Washington, DC, USA.

Abstract
In the present study we analyze the role of polarization in the biological activity of Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs)/Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR). All types of man-made EMFs/EMR - in contrast to natural EMFs/EMR - are polarized. Polarized EMFs/EMR can have increased biological activity, due to: 1) Ability to produce constructive interference effects and amplify their intensities at many locations. 2) Ability to force all charged/polar molecules and especially free ions within and around all living cells to oscillate on parallel planes and in phase with the applied polarized field. Such ionic forced-oscillations exert additive electrostatic forces on the sensors of cell membrane electro-sensitive ion channels, resulting in their irregular gating and consequent disruption of the cell's electrochemical balance. These features render man-made EMFs/EMR more bioactive than natural non-ionizing EMFs/EMR. This explains the increasing number of biological effects discovered during the past few decades to be induced by man-made EMFs, in contrast to natural EMFs in the terrestrial environment which have always been present throughout evolution, although human exposure to the latter ones is normally of significantly higher intensities/energy and longer durations. Thus, polarization seems to be a trigger that significantly increases the probability for the initiation of biological/health effects.

PMID:

26456585

[PubMed - in process]

PMCID:

PMC4601073

Free PMC Article  

Nature's Victims of Manmade Electromagnetic Radiation? Great Chestnut Trees of Europe

By the time the scientists add 1+1 and do their homework on manmade EMR impacts on delicate, molecular functions and processes in nature it may be too late.

Take the dying of the great chestnut trees of Europe, for example. Scientists are scratching their heads as to why the leaf miner moths are proliferating. These moths are robbing aged trees of sunlight and opening them to infections.

The article states, "Without any clear reason, the moth became rampant and spread through much of Europe about a decade ago."

Helloooo. Wireless emissions had taken hold and continued to grow around that time. A little research online shows that MOTHS (and other insects/creatures) can sense and use electromagnetic energy especially for mating purposes. This all happens at a molecular level.

Here are just a few quotes showing how these small lifeforms may be cued into electromagentic energy in ways humans do not yet understand.

"Entomologists and naturalists dating back to the early 18th Century had suggested the possibility that insects communicate by radiations emitted from oscillating molecules. Riley referred to certain subtle vibrations that could be detected by a sense organ that does not respond to light of the same frequencies that our eyes can see, but that responds to other frequencies to which we are blind."

"The moth antenna has a remarkable resemblance to a radar antenna."
"Phillip Callahan found a variety of correspondences between the structures of various insect antennas and radio and microwave antennas."


Would the scientists that have no clue why leaf miner moths are madly reproducing please look into the potential EMR impact ASAP?

American Medical Association should adopt Austrian Medical Association guidelines regarding EMF-related Illnesses

Take note, American Medical Association:


Guideline

of the Austrian Medical Association

for the diagnosis and treatment
of EMF related health problems and illnesses (EMF syndrome)
Consensus paper of the Austrian Medical Association’s EMF Working Group ( AG-EMF)

Adopted at the meeting of environmental medicine officers of the Regional Medical Association´s and the Austrian Medical Association on March 3, 2012 in Vienna.

ESPECIALLY NOTE #6:

6. Treatment

The primary method of treatment should consist in the prevention or reduction of EMF exposure, taking care to reduce or eliminate all sources of EMF if possible. Many examples have shown that such measures can prove effective.

Since sufficient EMF reduction is not possible in all cases, other measures can and must be considered. These include not only keeping additional exposure to a minimum, but also enhancing and increasing resistance to EMF. In some cases, positive effects of holistic medicine treatments have been reported.

We take it as given that appropriate treatment will be initiated after diagnosis if the patient presents manifest illness. Regardless of such treatment, the above-mentioned measures to reduce exposure should also be taken.

Magnetic sensors may (partly) explain microwave sickness or sensitivity

Birds can do it.
Fish can do it.
Rats can do it.
Why can't we?

Well, who says we can't feel magnetic changes in our environment like the animals do?
This article may shed some light on why some people report sensations from changes in environmental fields, including growing electro-pollution. A fascinating read, just the kind of evidence needed to debunk naysayers' assumptions!

Of course, other biological impacts and factors may be contributing to physical experience of the fields, including the actual damage in process to cellular and system function. A person's metal burden (stored heavy metals and chemicals) could also be factors. Metals especially would interact with electromagnetic waves. But this finding is important and the next step is to look for magnetic sensor in human cells.

Discovery of magnetic sensors in fish and rats may explain why some people can 'feel' wi-fi, smart meters, power lines and electropollution

Wednesday, July 11, 2012 by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger Editor of NaturalNews.com

History of Microwave Mania: 40-year-old US Government Report issued URGENT WARNING on Electromagnetic Pollution

This 2007 article (or try this link) by Karl Hecht and Elena N. Savoley of IRCHET International Research Centre of Healthy and Ecological Technology should be a call to action. Their well-researched piece, Overloading of Towns and Cities with Radio Transmitters (Cellular Transmitter): a hazard for the human health and a disturbance of eco-ethics, exposes the current US government's shocking disregard for public health and safety.

The article opens with the following quotations from a US government report on electromagnetic pollution from 1971 that issued an urgent warning about these emissions 40 years ago.

“The electromagnetic radiations emanating for radar, television, communications systems, microwave ovens, industrial heat-treatment systems, medical diathermy units, and many other sources permeate the modern environment, both civilian and military.”

“Unless adequate monitoring and control based on a fundamental understanding of biological effects are instituted in the near future, in the decades ahead, man may enter an era of energy pollution of the environment comparable to the chemical pollution of today.”

“The consequences of undervaluing or misjudging the biological effects of long-term, low-level exposure could become a critical problem for the public health, especially if genetic effects are involved.”

Hecht's article also vindicates the existence of electrohypersensitivity syndrome (EHS), also called Radiofrequency Sickness, Radio Wave Sickness or Microwave Sickness. It states that in 1932, the German doctor Erwin Schliephake published scientific data in the German Medical Weekly about radio transmitter-induced "microwave" or "radio wave sickness" with these symptoms: severe tiredness and fatigue during the day, fitful sleep in the night, headaches to the point of intolerability, and high susceptibility to infection. THIS WAS 80 YEARS AGO, people.

The article goes on to show how the newly discovered illness was verified as "microwave sickness, induced by athermal high-frequency EMF radiation." That's ATHERMAL, meaning below levels that cause heating effects. Our current government standards are ONLY based on heating effects, such as happens in higher settings of microwave ovens.

Hecht writes that the Russian author Zinaida Gordon from the Moscow Institute for Industrial Hygiene and Occupational Diseases scientifically verified Dr. Schliephake's findings, and examined over 1,000 people who worked at radio installations, electric utilities, radar stations, etc., over the duration of 10 years. Here are the common symptoms she established for microwave sickness:

daytime tiredness

loss of productiveness

sleeplessness

headaches

cardiovascular regulation changes of various types

neurovegetative disorders

neurosis

depressions

hyperactivity and inner agitation

Professor Gordon also found that the symptoms strengthened with increasing exposures, and sensitivity to microwave radiations increased.

Our government has been well-versed about the dangers of electromagnetic pollution for forty years, and its negligence is causing people to fall very ill from a scientifically documented condition, which has been in the literature since 1936 - nearly 80 years - and there is NO EXCUSE to ignore this.